The Foreign Direct Investment abbreviated as (FDI)
can be defined in a single sentence as “investment made by a foreign company to
a country. The investment is practiced either by taking proprietorship of a
company in the target country or by making operation's expansion of an existing
business in that country. The investment is made aiming at advantageous
experience – cheaper wages, special investment privileges, for example tax
exemptions, offered by the country.
Generally, a country taking FDI implementation
decision at the time of its domestic capital seems deficient for the economic
growth. The investment, under the FDI, made by foreign country economically
proved to be profitable at least as a temporary measure. The foreign capital
considerably consists other constructive constituents such as technical and new
ideas of knowing how a business provides
benefits to customers.
With the government's implementation of allowing
51% FDI in multi-brand retail in 2012, it
outcome with a storm protest across the political spectrum, and
eventually forced the government to back down and suspend it. Being India a
largest 3rd world country on global ground, it looks appropriate for
FDI. Here is pros and cons of FDI in the country.
Pros
·
As FDI
is responsible for improvement in forex position of a country, so does in India
·
Growth
in employment and production increase
·
Back up
for capital formation, as it brings fresh capital
·
Introduction
of innovative marketing skills, latest technologies and intellectual property
·
Competitiveness
escalation in domestic market, as it comes with higher efficiencies
·
Responsible
for boosting exports and increasing revenues
·
Products
available at cheaper rates
Cons
· With
the latest and innovative technologies used by foreign retailers, chances are
that local companies may lose their ownership
· The
domestic small enterprises may stand unparalleled to compete with the large
companies and may be compelled to close their business
· Big
brand foreign retailer may experience monopoly and take over highly profitable
sectors
· Unemployment
may increase because of machinery utilization of international brand rather
than paying wages to local people
· It is
also believed that government will have less control over such companies, as
they usually perform as completely owned subsidiary of an overseas
company.
No comments:
Post a Comment